Save contact
+7 (905) 589 53 28
Partner, Attorney at Law
ALEKSEY VYRUHAEV
An expert in commercial dispute resolution with over 15 years of experience. He handles complex litigation across all judicial instances, including the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, and manages projects and disputes in the fields of IT and intellectual property.
Expertise
Commercial and corporate disputes
Representation in all judicial instances
Litigation strategies for business
IT and Intellectual Property
Recognition
Pravo-300
Leader of the individual ranking, disputes in courts of general jurisdiction (2021–2022)
Kommersant
Disputes in courts of general jurisdiction — Band 1 (2020, 2022)
CCI of Russia
Letter of Appreciation from the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation
Alexey is the co-head of the dispute resolution practice and possesses more than 15 years of experience representing business interests in commercial conflicts. He handles complex litigation in commercial (arbitration) courts and courts of general jurisdiction at all levels, including the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, developing comprehensive strategies to protect the interests of clients.

Alexey also has experience in structuring transactions in the field of IT and intellectual property, as well as handling disputes related to the protection and use of IP assets. His practice encompasses both litigation support and the preventive legal structuring of projects.

Biography

cases
Successful representation of an internationally recognized fashion designer in connection with third-party infringements of the client's exclusive rights to textile designs and photographs of said products.
Comprehensive protection of the interests of a television channel and a major media company before the Federal Antimonopoly Service and in commercial courts regarding claims by third parties concerning the production of similar television programs and demands for the recovery of over 200 million rubles in damages.
Successful defense of the interests of major Russian IT companies in connection with attempts to recover damages incurred by purchasers due to foreign software manufacturers ceasing operations within the Russian Federation.
Representation of a major developer in relations with public law entities and the successful recovery of damages from a city district administration caused to the developer by the unlawful refusal to issue a permit to commission a facility.
Successful defense of industrial equipment suppliers in various disputes with counterparties, including matters related to the quality of the equipment supplied.
Representation of one of the largest Russian real estate companies before the Federal Antimonopoly Service, resulting in the cessation of unauthorized use by third parties of confusingly similar means of individualization and trademarks.
Legal support for a chain of transactions to establish a distribution network for a major IT company and software rights holder. Development and structuring of a system of license and sublicense agreements ensuring control over end users and resellers without the client's operational involvement. Provided full project support—from legal strategy development to the negotiation and signing of agreements with distributors.
Legal support in a dispute regarding the recovery of damages and penalties arising from the termination of technical support for a trading platform by a foreign provider. A legal position was formulated to distinguish between the liability of the certificate provider and the copyright holder, and proper performance of obligations under the supply agreement was proven. Courts of three instances upheld the legal position developed in the client's interest.
Representation of the general contractor's management in a criminal case concerning the alleged embezzlement of budget funds during the creation of subsystems for the Federal State Information System of the Unified State Register of Real Estate (FGIS EGRN). A legal position was formulated that confirmed the faithful performance of contractual obligations. The clients' actions were qualified as legitimate business activities, which made it possible to preclude criminal prosecution and preserve their business reputation.